Basket

  Untick selected:   0
  1. SYS0253779
    LBL
      
    01209^^^^^2200325^^^450
    005
      
    20250311141642.1
    014
      
    $a 000419680500002 $2 CCC
    014
      
    $a 000419680500002 $2 WOS CC. SCIE
    014
      
    $a 2-s2.0-85040517798 $2 SCOPUS
    014
      
    $a BCI201800168813 $2 BIOSIS Citation Index
    014
      
    $a ZOOR15501000098 $2 ZR
    017
    70
    $a 10.3897/natureconservation.24.21608 $2 DOI
    035
      
    $a biblio/51070 $2 CREPC2
    100
      
    $a 20180311d2018 m y slo 03 ba
    101
    0-
    $a eng
    102
      
    $a BG
    200
    1-
    $a Effectiveness of Natura 2000 system for habitat types protection: A case study from the Czech Republic $f Vilém Pechanec ... [et al.]
    330
      
    $a In conservation biology, there is a general consensus that protected areas (PAs) are one of the most effective tools for biodiversity protection. Worldwide, the area of PAs is continually increasing. But is the effectiveness of biodiversity protection improving with it? Since many PAs only exist as “paper parks” (i.e. they exist on maps and in legislation but offer little actual protection), the answer is uncertain. Moreover, it has long been known that, not only an increase in the extent of PAs, but also the efficiency of their management is fundamentally important for effective nature conservation. Therefore, there is a wide-ranging discussion about the actual effectiveness of PAs and factors that influence it. In the course of the EU pre-accession phase, a comprehensive field mapping of natural habitats took place in the Czech Republic in years 2001−2004. The mapping results were used to designate Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) as part of the Natura 2000 network. In this study, the aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of this newly created system of SACs for protection of biodiversity represented by the mapped natural habitats. The NCEI index (Nature Conservation Effectiveness Index) was applied, calculated as the total area of a particular habitat type in all SACs in the Czech Republic divided by the total area of that same natural habitat in the entire Czech Republic. Habitat protection in the Czech Republic is focused primarily on the smallest types of rare habitats, many of which are classified as critically endangered. The Czech national system of SACs provides protection to a total of 4,491.68 km2 of natural habitats. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the overall effectiveness of the SAC system in the Czech Republic, which is specifically aimed at protecting natural habitats, is low (NCEI = 0.36). Nevertheless, the critically endangered habitats receive maximum protection (NCEI = 1).
    463
    -1
    $1 001 umb_un_cat*0288305 $1 200 1 $a Nature conservation $v No. 24 (2018), pp. 21-41 $1 210 $a Sofia $c Pensoft Publishers $d 2018 $1 011 $a 1314-6947 $1 011 $a 1314-3301
    606
    0-
    $3 umb_un_auth*0266602 $a conservation effectiveness
    606
    0-
    $3 umb_un_auth*0266603 $a natural habitats
    606
    0-
    $3 umb_un_auth*0040245 $a mapovanie
    606
    0-
    $3 umb_un_auth*0266604 $a nature conservation effectiveness index
    615
      
    $n 502 $a Životné prostredie
    675
      
    $a 502
    700
    -1
    $3 umb_un_auth*0266605 $a Pechanec $b Vilém $4 070 $9 5
    701
    -1
    $3 umb_un_auth*0173804 $a Machar $b Ivo $4 070 $9 50
    701
    -1
    $3 umb_un_auth*0266606 $a Pohanka $b Tomáš $4 070 $9 5
    701
    -1
    $3 umb_un_auth*0266607 $a Opršal $b Zdeněk $4 070 $9 5
    701
    -1
    $3 umb_un_auth*0143088 $a Petrovič $b František $4 070 $9 5
    701
    -1
    $3 umb_un_auth*0124339 $a Švajda $b Juraj $p UMBFP09 $4 070 $9 5 $f 1975- $T Katedra biológie a environmentálnych štúdií
    701
    -1
    $3 umb_un_auth*0266608 $a Šálek $b Lubomír $4 070 $9 5
    701
    -1
    $3 umb_un_auth*0266609 $a Chobot $b Karel $4 070 $9 5
    701
    -1
    $3 umb_un_auth*0266610 $a Filippovová $b Jarmila $4 070 $9 5
    701
    -1
    $3 umb_un_auth*0266611 $a Cudlín $b Pavel $4 070 $9 5
    701
    -1
    $3 umb_un_auth*0266612 $a Málková $b Jitka $4 070 $9 5
    801
      
    $a SK $b BB301 $g AACR2 $9 unimarc sk
    856
      
    $u https://natureconservation.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=21608 $a Link na zdrojový dokument
    T85
      
    $x existuji fulltexy
  2. SYS0326067
    LBL
      
    00000nas2-22--------450-
    005
      
    20240123141940.9
    011
      
    $a 1335-521X
    100
      
    $a 20021125d2024----m--y0sloy0103----ca
    101
    0-
    $a rus
    102
      
    $a SK
    110
      
    $a aga
    200
    1-
    $a Spolu Vmeste $e russkij žurnal v slovakii $e ruský časopis na Slovensku $e žurnal russkoj diaspory v slovakii $e časopis ruskej národnostnej menšiny na Slovensku
    210
      
    $a Bratislava $c Zväz Rusov na Slovensku $d 2023
    461
    -1
    $1 001 umb_un_cat*0001832 $1 200 1 $a Spolu Vmeste
  3. SYS0031064
    LBL
      
    $$$$$naa$$22$$$$$$$$450$
    005
      
    20240726104237.4
    100
      
    $a 20061129d2006łłłłm y$slo$03 $$$$ba
    101
      
    $a slo
    102
      
    $a SK
    200
    1-
    $a Vladimír Biloveský: Termín a/alebo metafora $f Hedviga Kubišová
    463
    -1
    $1 001 umb_un_cat*0027749 $1 011 $a 0231-6269 $1 200 1 $a Revue svetovej literatúry $e časopis pre zahraničnú literatúru $v Roč. 42, č. 3 (2006), s. 156-157 $1 210 $a Bratislava $c Slovenská spoločnosť prekladateľov umeleckej literatúry $d 2006
    470
    -1
    $1 001 umb_un_cat*0018045 $1 010 $a 80-8083-078-9 $1 200 1 $a Termín a/alebo metafora? $e (preklad anglicky písaných neumeleckých textov s umeleckými prvkami) $f Vladimír Biloveský $g rec. Edita Gromová, Ivo Pospíšil $1 210 $a Banská Bystrica $c Univerzita Mateja Bela $d 2005 $1 215 $a 146 s. $1 700 0 $3 umb_un_auth*0006567 $a Biloveský $b Vladimír $f 1968- $4 070 $1 702 1 $3 umb_un_auth*0108103 $a Gromová $b Edita $1 702 0 $3 umb_un_auth*0006449 $a Pospíšil $b Ivo
    606
    0-
    $3 umb_un_auth*0038335 $a angličtina $X English language
    606
    0-
    $3 umb_un_auth*0036080 $a eseje $X essays
    606
    0-
    $3 umb_un_auth*0037694 $a recenzie $X reviews
    606
    0-
    $3 umb_un_auth*0118488 $a essays
    615
      
    $n 811.111 $a Angličtina $2 konspekt
    615
      
    $n 811.111 $2 konspekt
    675
      
    $v 1.stred. $z slo
    700
    -0
    $3 umb_un_auth*0005533 $a Kubišová $b Hedviga $f 1948- $p UMBFI05 $4 070 $T Katedra slovakistiky
    801
    -0
    $a SK $b BB301 $g AACR2 $9 unimarc sk
    T85
      
    $x existuji fulltexy
  4. SYS0213270
    LBL
      
    00542nx^^^22001813^^45
    005
      
    20170814111545.0
    250
      
    $a motivácia k vzdelávaniu
    450
      
    $7 ba $5 z

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.