Search results

Records found: 2  
Your query: Author Sysno/Doc.kind = "^umb_un_auth 0291089 xpca^"
  1. TitleEpistemická disfigurácia reprezentatívneho modelu demokracie v krízovej situácii
    Par.titleEpistemic disfiguration of the representative democracy model in a crisis situation
    Author infoSimona Kováčová
    Author Kováčová Simona 1987- (100%) UMBPO01 - Katedra politológie
    Source document Interpolis '22 : recenzovaný zborník vedeckých prác z medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie Interpolis '22. S. 55-67. - Banská Bystrica : Vydavateľstvo Univerzity Mateja Bela - Belianum, 2022 / Kováčová Eleonóra 1977- ; Šimková Patrícia 1996- ; Žipaj Tomáš 1996- ; Nečas Pavel 1960- ; Kováčová Natália 1987- ; Kucharčík Rudolf ; Rýsová Lucia 1977- ; Interpolis '22 medzinárodná vedecká konferencia
    Keywords politické rozhodovanie - political decision making - decision making in politics   epistemická zodpovednosť - epistemic responsibility   covid-19 - koronavírus - Covid-19 (disease) - SARS-CoV-2 disease - Coronavirus disease 2019  
    Form. Descr.príspevky v zborníku - proceedings papers
    LanguageSlovak
    CountrySlovak Republic
    URL Link na plný text
    Public work category AFD
    No. of Archival Copy52708
    Catal.org.BB301 - Univerzitná knižnica Univerzity Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici
    Databasexpca - PUBLIKAČNÁ ČINNOSŤ
  2. TitleEpistemic and ethical responsibility during the pandemic
    Author infoAndrea Klimková
    Author Klimková Andrea 1967- (100%) UMBFF10 - Katedra filozofie
    Source document Ethics & Bioethics : (in Central Europe). Vol. 11, no. 3-4 (2021), pp. 117-125. - Warsaw : De Gruyter Poland, 2021
    Keywords epistemická zodpovednosť - epistemic responsibility   morálna zodpovednosť   epistemické komunity - epistemic communities   pandémie - pandémia - pandemy  
    Form. Descr.články - journal articles
    LanguageEnglish
    CountryPoland
    AnnotationIntellectual (specialised) knowledge is omnipresent in human lives and decisions. We are constantly trying to make good and correct decisions. However, responsible decision-making is characterised by rather difficult epistemic conditions. It applies all the more during the pandemic when decisions require not only specialised knowledge in a number of disciplines, scientific consensus, and participants from different fields, but also responsibility and respect for moral principles in order to ensure that the human rights of all groups are observed. Pandemic measures are created by politicians, healthcare policy-makers, and epidemiologists. However, what is the role of ethics as a moral philosophy and experts in ethics? Experts in ethics and philosophy are carefully scrutinising political decisions. Levy and Savulescu (2020) have claimed that Ethicists and philosophers are not epistemically arrogant if they question policy responses. They played an important role in the creation of a reliable consensus. This study analyses epistemic and moral responsibility, their similarities, analogies, and differences. Are they interconnected? What is their relationship and how can they be filled with actual content during the pandemic?
    URLLink na plný text
    Public work category ADM
    No. of Archival Copy51065
    Repercussion category DA SILVA NETO, Priscila Kelly - DE SOUZA, Marcela Tavares - DE GOUVEA, Aline Russomano - DA MATA, Luciana Regina Ferreira - LUCHESI, Bruna Moretti - PESSALACIA, Juliana Dias Reis. Health professionals' knowledge about ethical criteria in the allocation of resources in the COVID-19 pandemic. In Monash bioethics review. ISSN 1321-2753, 2023, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 181-197.
    ROMERA, Andrea. No room for patients or ethics : Covid-19-broken hospitals in Madrid. In Ethics and bioethics. ISSN 1338-5615, 2022, vol. 12, no. 1-2, pp. 79-83.
    Catal.org.BB301 - Univerzitná knižnica Univerzity Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici
    Databasexpca - PUBLIKAČNÁ ČINNOSŤ
    ReferencesPERIODIKÁ-Súborný záznam periodika


  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.