SYS | | 0276989 |
LBL | | 01442^^^^^2200217^^^450 |
005 | | 20241121085915.7 |
014 | | $a 000407487800005 $2 CCC |
014 | | $a 000407487800005 $2 WOS CC. AHCI |
014 | | $a 2-s2.0-85027445411 $2 SCOPUS |
017 | 70 | $a 10.1515/znw-2017-0012 $2 DOI |
035 | | $a biblio/469903 $2 CREPC2 |
100 | | $a 20191018d2017 m y slo 03 ba |
101 | 0- | $a eng |
102 | | $a DE |
200 | 1- | $a "And you purchased [whom?]": reconsidering the text of Rev 5,9 $f Peter Málik |
330 | 0- | $a Ever since Tischendorf, the majority of text-critics and exegetes have regarded omission of ἡμᾶς at Rev 5,9 as part of the initial text. The sole support for this reading is furnished by Codex Alexandrinus. The present article argues that, conversely, it is in fact the longer reading, ἠγόρασας ἡμᾶς τῷ θεῷ, attested in the majority of manuscripts, that is to be preferred and the omission in Alexandrinus is more likely to have originated by assimilation to the context or as a mere scribal error |
463 | -1 | $1 001 umb_un_cat*0277640 $1 011 $a 0044-2615 $1 011 $a 1613-009X $1 200 1 $a Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche $d Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft $v Roč. 108, č. 2 (2017), s. 306-312 $1 210 $a Berlin $c Walter de Gruyter $d 2017 |
606 | 0- | $3 umb_un_auth*0045084 $a kódexy $X codexes |
606 | 0- | $3 umb_un_auth*0043228 $a rukopisy $X handwriting $X manuscripts |
606 | 0- | $3 umb_un_auth*0177764 $a apokalypsa $X apocalypse |
606 | 0- | $3 umb_un_auth*0047874 $a technika čítania |
606 | 0- | $3 umb_un_auth*0053217 $a textová kritika $X textual criticism |
608 | | $3 umb_un_auth*0273282 $a články $X journal articles |
700 | -1 | $3 umb_un_auth*0176272 $a Málik $b Peter $4 070 $9 100 $f 1986- |
801 | | $a SK $b BB301 $g AACR2 $9 unimarc sk |
856 | | $u https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/znw.2017.108.issue-2/znw-2017-0012/znw-2017-0012.xml?format=INT $a Link na zdrojový dokument |
T85 | | $x existuji fulltexy |